#259950 - 11/02/04 07:50 PM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
Sol: Didn't you hear Dick Cheny IS the president.
I would be happy to vote for John McCain
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259951 - 11/02/04 07:51 PM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 12/09/03
Posts: 399
Loc: Seattle
|
I agree with the McCain idea.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259953 - 11/02/04 09:40 PM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Parr
Registered: 07/06/04
Posts: 73
Loc: Longview, Washington
|
I'm not a Democrat (I'm fiercely independent of the parties). But so far I've never voted for a Republican for President (first got to vote in '92). I would be happy to vote for McCain.
_________________________
Do not tell fish stories where the people know you; but particularly, don't tell them where they know the fish. --Mark Twain
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259954 - 11/02/04 09:53 PM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259957 - 11/02/04 11:09 PM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 03/06/99
Posts: 1231
Loc: Western Washington
|
John McCain. I was a huge supporter of McCain back in '00. I ended up voting for W. because I thought was a very good choice as well (I am fairly conservative).
In my absolute refusal to vote for someone who I do not support, I voted for Micheal Badnarik (L) because him and his party represent my old school conservative views much more then the current Republican Party which we all know has been hijacked by the Religious Right (hence my support for the much more moderate McCain).
So far it has been a night to celebrate as Badnarik is only 30,000 votes behind Nader.
_________________________
Ryan S. Petzold aka Sparkey and/or Special
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259960 - 11/03/04 12:35 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
The Rainman
Registered: 03/05/01
Posts: 2314
Loc: elma washington
|
mrs clinton mainly to see the look on bill o'rilly (sp) face
_________________________
don't push the river it flows by itself Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference. FREE PARKER DEATH TO RATS
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259961 - 11/03/04 12:37 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 01/26/02
Posts: 301
Loc: everett,wa
|
Kerry,McCain,Howard Dean,Beezer,Parker,Leadthrower,4salt,trb,anyone except the little oil pimp (Bush)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259962 - 11/03/04 01:53 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 2237
Loc: N of Seattle
|
I'll vote for whoever Arnold tells me to vote for. I hope it's Nugent and he campaigns from Dear stand while launching arrow after arrow into pictures of Sadom, Bin Laden and that pu$$ie that's runnin France. AMERICA f#$%^YA
_________________________
When Ma Nature decides to make ya her bitch, aint nothin your gonna do about it
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259963 - 11/03/04 07:06 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 03/12/01
Posts: 434
Loc: Puyallup, WA
|
Word has it that Guliani is going to run in 2008. I think either him or Nugent. Thing I liked about Ventura was that he told it like it was, none of this BS like everyone else. I could care less if I disagreed with every issue he stood for he'd still get my vote. To many of these other idiots are like Kerry and have set their entire life on acheiving this goal. People like Ventura aren't career politicians and have nothing to lose by speaking their mind.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259966 - 11/03/04 10:38 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Kitsap's Crankiest Contractor
Registered: 11/24/03
Posts: 2268
Loc: Poulsbo
|
There's only one choice I can think of. That there would be Sol_on_the_Duck. Let me elaborate. He's as true blue American as you can get, he doesn't step into other peoples stuff (except for your bad eggs), he doesn't believe we should have things we don't need (smokers), he's hard headed on his beliefs (how to fish), and he calls a bad net job when he see's one. Now you have it!
_________________________
Have you ever listened to someone for a while and wondered..."who ties your shoelaces for you?"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259967 - 11/03/04 11:10 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 06/30/04
Posts: 1078
Loc: Silverdale, WA
|
I think a ticket of Powell as president, and Rudy as VP would be great.
_________________________
"A bad day fishing, is always better than a good day of yard work"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259968 - 11/03/04 11:36 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Parr
Registered: 06/11/04
Posts: 48
Loc: Tacoma, WA
|
Nader for president!!!!!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#259969 - 11/03/04 11:50 AM
Re: Then "who" for president
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by stlhd_dreaming: I agree Hillary or McKain either one would be my choice what if they both run in 08 I could handle McCain... but...HILLARY?????????? No Freakin way! If Hillary gets to be Pres. then I'm moving to a place on the Vedder...cause there soon won't be much difference between the Socialist life in B.C. vs. the Socialist life in the US. (IF she got elected.) She might do better for the environment than Bush...but then again, none of us would have the $$ to buy a license. Kevin: Someone needs to some sense into you! Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72935 Topics
825151 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|